Writers: Only One Creative Element in Successful Television

Writers: Only One Creative Element in Successful Television

Many writers see themselves as God-almighty when it comes to the projects they work on. They control the motivation, the actions and the outcome from the first page to the last. In novels, this is true, but only if there is a sole author. Every other venue is a collective effort of talents and voices who work together towards a common goal. As long as there is equality and balance, most projects work. When projects fail, it is usually due to a prima donna in the group who insists on singing a soliloquy instead of being part of the chorus.

Although there were will eventually be editors who contribute to the finally draft of a book, the author is the primary creative force. Whether fiction or non-fiction, the author sets both the pace and the direction of the piece. There is one vision, one voice and ultimately one person responsible for the completed project. It is a very self-contained process, with little or no outside creative input until it is offered to the public.

In both movies and television, the writer is the architect who creates the blueprint that others will make a reality. Producers provide the resources and hire the staff. The director organizes the technical staff and builds the structure. The actors and musicians are the interior decorators, who give it color and depth to make it livable. No one role is any more important than another for each contributes equally to the finished product. Like architect, once the writer turns over the script, they are relegated to a consultant role on this project, while moving to their next creative challenge.

In the same way that movies and television differ from books, so does television differ from movies. In most cases, a film is a self contained project that brings together the talent for a single closed-ended event. In television, the major goal is to keep it going indefinitely. Although some of staff may change, there is always a group who will remain from the moment the lights were turned on to they go dark. The longer the show runs the smaller the inner core comes. It is this group who are the ultimate experts on the show; they are living biographies of the characters and the show’s history.

In most cases, writers, directors and technical staff rotate in and out, but it is the on air talent that the viewers most closely identify with the show. The actor, who originated the character, has the consistency and a clearer understanding of the inner qualities that keeps it popular and growing. The initial writers may have created the characters, but it is the actors who take them off the page and make them real to the audience. Even if the originating writer remains with the show, there needs to be a cooperative effort between the writer and actor in order for the character to develop. Without this balance, the character will not be consistent or believable. The writer has to understand the character in order to make it convincing, just as the actor has to be comfortable living in the character’s skin to keep the characterization a good fit.

Writers who step into an existing show need to play catch up. No matter how much outside research she or he does, the actor who has lived in the role will be the best asset the writer can have. However, the reverse is also true. A new writer can breathe fresh air into a show, giving it new life and inspiration. By bringing in a new perspective, the writer can give new twists to old plots and help the actors develop additional depth to their characters by opening new challenges. There needs to be a balance between the past and the future in order for the show to stay imaginative and original from episode to episode--year to year. As long as a show remains balance by being inventive, while honoring its history, and keeping the egos in check, it will be able to keep its fan base happy; thereby continuing its success.